FS50252690

Department: Information Commissioners Office

Published: 2010-09-02 15:13:05

The complainant requested information from the London Borough of Merton (“the Council”) concerning proposals to make certain roles within the Council redundant. The Council initially refused to provide any information citing the exemptions under section 40(2) and 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the FOIA”). In relation to the latter exemption, it concluded that the public interest favoured withholding the information. During the internal review, the Council provided the information that it had sought to withhold using section 40(2). Once the scope of the request had been clarified, the information withheld under section 43(2) was no longer relevant. The Council identified that it held a number of items of information relating to the request that had either been disclosed or which were already in the public domain. It disclosed this information in a single bundle to the complainant. It then sought to withhold a small amount of information under sections 36(2)(b)(ii) and 36(2)(c). It considered that the public interest favoured maintenance of the exemptions. The Information Commissioner (“the Commissioner”) was satisfied that section 36(2)(b)(ii) was engaged in respect of this information but he did not agree that the public interest favoured withholding it. The arguments identified by the qualified person in relation to section 36(2)(c) were found to be relevant and reasonable but in relation to section 36(2)(b)(ii). Having addressed the arguments under section 36(2)(b)(ii), it was not necessary to consider section 36(2)(c) further as no additional arguments were made about how disclosure would otherwise prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs. The Commissioner considers that the Council breached sections 10(1), 1(1)(b) and 17(1) (a), (b) and (c) of the FOIA.

This government news item was published on the Information Commissioners Office website on the 02 September 2010.

To read the full story/press release, please click on the button below (opens in an embedded window):

Have your say…

There are no comments for this news item yet. Why not start the ball rolling and comment about this Government news story by filling in the fields below:

Information Commissioners Office News

Take action on the ePrivacy Directive with Evidon
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:00:00 -0800
Following the well-attended inaugural Evidon Empower Europe event in December, Evidon, the world’s largest dedicated provider of privacy and compliance solutions for digital media,

Update 2: Privacy Alert: O2 Fixes Hole That Shared Users' Phone Numbers
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:36:53 -0800
Update : Mobile operator O2 says that as of 2pm Wednesday, it has fixed the part of its mobile web browsing service that was reporting mobile phone users’ telephone numbers to websites they visited via ...

Employment tribunal rules against rights for blacklisted agency workers
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:02:32 -0800
The multinational construction company Carillion won an employment tribunal (ET) today, Friday, against a blacklisted worker.

Revealed - true scale of the blacklisting scandal
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:22:41 -0800
Socialist Worker can reveal shocking new information about how construction bosses operated a blacklist of trade unionists.

O2 closes number leak loophole [Update: Official comment]
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:54:46 -0800
UK carrier O2 has apparently fixed the loophole that exposed subscribers’ mobile numbers to websites they visited using their handset’s data connection, though there’s still no official explanation as to how the issue arose. Controversy sparked earlier today, when one O2 subscriber realized browsing sites via his phone’s data connection transmitted his number in among [...]